Erica Garman at 10:18 a.m., November 3, 2008 (15 comments)
Living in LoCo contributors Dave Nemetz of Lansdowne, Amanda Carruthers of Belmont Country Club, Tom Regan of Lovettsville and Marie Bertozzi of near Brambleton wrote in with some of their observations about the political activity in their neighborhoods in the weeks running up to the election.
The Signs of Lansdowne
It's a sign of the (election season) times: political signs for various candidates are popping up in front yards all over the county. As Val Cavalheri wrote about for Living in LoCo on Oct. 22, some neighborhoods in Loudoun are experiencing problems because of political signs.
Not so, though, in Lansdowne on the Potomac.
Signs were sparse early in October, but in the past two weeks or so, more have started to pop up. In an informal survey I took during a drive through the neighborhood recently, I found about 42 homes on the main arteries displaying political signs. Of those homes with signs, my guess is that about 60 percent favored Barack Obama, and 40 percent were for John McCain. There was a sprinkling of signs for Mark Warner, but very few signs for Jim Gilmore, Frank Wolf and Judy Feder, all down-ticket from the presidential candidates.
Lansdowne's Declaration of Covenants (Section 7.15) restricts signage in the community to real estate and security signs only, but that hasn't stopped residents from showing support for their preferred candidates.
The Code of Virginia, section 15.2-109, says (in part) "(n)o locality shall have the authority to prohibit the display of political campaign signs on private property ... if the signs have been posted with the permission of the owner." But in a 2004 ruling, according to www.vahoalaw.com, Virginia Attorney General Jerry Kilgore ruled that "the restriction imposed by § 15.2-109 on a locality's authority to regulate the display of political campaign signs on private property does not apply to private homeowners' associations."
It seemed to me that residents here have been quite civil in their tolerance for the signs, as I have noticed no apparent vandalism. Signs have stayed where they were posted. Of course, some residents see the signs as a violation of the covenants. But to the credit of Lansdowne residents, it has not deteriorated into destruction or partisan sniping.
-- Dave Nemetz
Disappearing Signs
Looking at the signs in my area of Ashburn, I've seen about 100 political signs in people's yards. Generally, the signs are for one of the two presidential candidates, not the state or local candidates. Most are for McCain/Palin – at least 80 percent by my quick, informal count.
We've had some problems with signs in our neighborhood. We had a McCain/Palin sign in our yard, as did about four or five of our neighbors. During the night of Obama's appearance in Leesburg about two weeks ago, all of our signs disappeared. We're not sure who took them, but we were able to replace them with new signs from the local Republican Party.
-- Amanda Carruthers
A Shift in the County
If you want to know how much Loudoun County has changed politically in the last decade, Kristine Condi can give you a pretty good idea.
Kristine told me that when she moved to Loudoun in 1997, then in the eastern part of the county, you didn't necessarily let people know your political opinions ... if you were a Democrat. When she put up an Al Gore sign on her front lawn in 2000, she received hate mail and nasty phone calls. Later, when she worked as a Democratic organizer, finding poll workers was like "pulling teeth" and many of those who did volunteer told her they didn't want to work in areas where their neighbors might see them.
But Kristine, who now lives in Taylorstown and is working for the Obama campaign, says it's a completely different situation this time. This time she has many more poll workers then she needs, and she says people are no longer shy about telling people they are Democrats. It's a whole new world for her.
"I've never experienced the kind of energy that the Obama campaign has brought to the local level," she said on the phone the other day. "It's a big change."
Overall, in my unofficial survey of friends and acquaintances in the area, Kristine seems to be right. Many said they were leaning toward Obama. A couple of folks, parents of one of my daughter's friends, started up conversations about the election with me. They said normally they vote Republican, but not this time. They were angry about the current administration, and they didn't like the tone of McCain's campaign.
Not everyone, however, is taken with the Illinois senator.
My friend Tia Brierton, who lives in Lovettsville and describes herself as conservative, believes that McCain can still pull it out.
She was not originally a McCain supporter (Mike Huckabee was her guy). But she believes that all the things that drive her crazy about the Arizona senator – "Sometimes, I find myself screaming at the TV yelling 'Why did you say that?' '' she joked – are what make him the right man for the job. He'll do what's best for America, regardless of what anybody says, she said.
Tia added that she still thinks that many people who say they are voting for Obama aren't telling the truth and will switch to McCain on Election Day - but not because of Obama's race. Tia thinks he's just too liberal for most Virginia voters.
Regardless of political leanings, almost all the folks I talked with would probably agree with one thing that Tia told me: "Anybody who tells you that they are undecided in this election is just not telling you the truth."
-- Tom Regan
Where Are the Undecideds?
In the past few weeks, as I have been talking to friends, family, neighbors and clients, I have not yet met an "undecided" voter.
I know that they exist. I know this thanks to the media coverage, both nationally and locally. One needs only to remember the interviews that NBC's Today show conducted with our own undecided Loudouners after the last presidential debate. As the campaigns have hit the local streets around Brambleton and South Riding, they have spent many hours trying to find and persuade those undecided voters to come over to their side.
But in my day-to-day interactions, I have not met anyone who doesn't have a very strong opinion as to who should be the next president of the United States. So, undecideds, if you are still out there, let us know what you are thinking.
-- Marie Bertozzi
Don't see your neighborhood represented here? Let us know below what you are seeing and hearing about the campaigns. And visit our November 2008 Elections page to find your polling station, view our voter guide and more.
Punch Your Way to Fitness! 5 for $25, 10 for $40! Fitness punch cards are now available. A flexible alternative ...
• View all deals from Lady Of America | All deals
• LoudounExtra.com Has a Deal for You! 1/2 Off Ads! expires: 12/31/08
|
Search Deals and Business Directory |
Will you make a New Year's resolution this year?
Comments:
Note: LoudounExtra.com does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Peruse our reader agreement and privacy policy
The Post's revenues declined 85% in the last quarter for a reason...maybe this should be your own poll...biased reporting, unfair slams at Sarah Palin, reporting false facts (Kill him) without retraction, people don't want to read your slanted articles any more...cancel your subscriptions today --read the Drudge Report, Fox news online, find all the news you believe, and disregard the propaganda of the Leftist gossip rag with no ethics or journalistic standards, the Washington Post.
Posted by MANN12 (anonymous) on November 3, 2008 at 10:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
You know, there are actually people in Loudoun County who support a third-party candidate. How about scoping out a few of them? We may not have yard signs, but we do have principles.
Posted by kaylex99 (anonymous) on November 3, 2008 at 10:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow theres a word I have not heard the entire season Principles. I cancelled by sub 2 years ago.
Posted by Funnyguyva (anonymous) on November 3, 2008 at 11:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Right - Fox News is definitely balanced - Ha! That's hysterical! McCain should lose the election based solely on the bad judgment of choosing Sarah Palin. If he drops dead, there is absolutely NO WAY that woman is qualified to be president. He was just looking for a way to bring in the Christian conservatives - be careful what you wish for. This country needs intelligent people running the show, not some crazy creationist who thinks people & dinosaurs ran around together as late as 4,000 years ago.
Posted by ms1234 (anonymous) on November 3, 2008 at 12:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Actually, if you want a rounded outlook on what's happening, you should review multiple news sources. For example, when I did this a few years ago, I found that the Washington Post and CNN, among other news outlets, faithfully reproduced Associated Press articles, whereas Fox News online had a disturbing record of censoring portions of AP articles to fit their "fair and balanced" reporting style. In some news items, while the Post presents both sides of the argument with a liberal slant, Fox News just doesn't bother reporting an opposing viewpoint. I still read Fox News, but I do not restrict my news gathering to one source. So, if you really want to expand your horizons, get several different outlooks on the same news report. Or, you can just stay in your sheltered hole and snipe at the "mainstream liberal elite media" because you disagree with it.
Posted by jlstapleton (anonymous) on November 3, 2008 at 1:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow, MANN12, what happened? I read a community-based post by a hard-working writer, scroll to the bottom to look at the comments, and you respond with "Death To The Washington Post?"
I can't speak about all folks at The Post. But I've met Erica, Paul Tenorio, Ed Guzman and a few others at LoudounExtra and they have plenty of ethics, work hard and are good people. If you have a beef with coverage of certain issues, great. But please don't paint everyone with the same brush.
Come on, MANN12. You say a lot of good, smart things. This wasn't one of them. You're better than this.
Posted by hphokie (anonymous) on November 3, 2008 at 1:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
MANN12 - and yet you continue to read and post to a WP sponsored blog. Hypocrite comes to mind.
Posted by t8erman (anonymous) on November 3, 2008 at 2:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I do feel badly about signs that disappear from people's yards. I've had 8 signs removed and replaced over the course of October and November. Last night 4 were taken, even though the taker got dirty hands while ripping them up.(I slathered petroleum jelly all over my signs)
I worry for our country. I worry for the intolerance and ungrounded fear. I worry for the ignorance of thinking that the color of a human being somehow changes his ability to lead a country.
Human beings are one species. God bless us all!
(My signs were for Obama)
AJ Cargo
Posted by aycargo (anonymous) on November 4, 2008 at 6:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hey, at least it was only petroleum jelly... What a great idea.
Posted by qazwsxedcrfv (anonymous) on November 4, 2008 at 10:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Dont have an account? Sign up!
Post a comment